Thursday, July 24, 2008

Comcast goes into the digital deep

Being one of the largest providers of a nearly essential service (gotta have my 'Deadliest Catch') opens you up to some fairly vocal criticism, especially when your customer service can be less than stellar.

Former TVNewser blogger Brian Stelter has an interesting story tonight on the New York Times web site about Comcast's new digital media engagement strategy. Spearheaded by Comcast's digital care manager, Frank Eliason, the company is opening a new front in communicating with its customers when things go wrong. Stelter writes:

From a sparse desk dominated by two computer screens in the new Comcast Center here, Mr. Eliason uses readily available online tools to monitor public comments on blogs, message boards and social networks for any mention of Comcast, the nation’s largest cable company. When he sees a complaint...he contacts the source to try to defuse the problem.
Monitoring the blogosphere and rapidly responding to customer concerns is one thing, but Comcast takes the online dialogue a step further by providing another dimension of corporate personality via Twitter. Eliason provides a name and face for the company's customer care services by "tweeting" with customers as their issues and questions occur. Did your service tech not show up for his appointment? Is this the third time in 2 days your internet stopped working? Eliason is on the case with a friendly tweet and quick action. Together with improving Comcast's customer care, Eliason rounds out an effort to improve service and humanize a massive corporation.

Developing corporate personality (an extension of your brand) is one of the biggest benefits Twitter can bring to a company. Of course, Twitter can't really do much on its own to bolster personality. However, when coupled with the right social media tools to fit an organization's communications goals (check out Red Cross for another example), Twitter can be a highly effective medium. What does Twitter do when it has its own service issues? They blog, naturally.

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

More tips for rumor response

I've been reading a lot of Peter Sandman lately and am a huge fan of his Risk = Hazard + Outrage principle. I especially like the way he separates risk communication issues into logical, strategic categories: High Hazard/High Outrage (Crisis Communication), High Hazard/Low Outrage (Precaution Advocacy) and Low Hazard/High Outrage (Outrage Management). His theories can be applied effectively to many issues management programs and work particularly well in health-related crisis/risk communications. All of his columns are really worth a good, thorough read.

I was excited to see that Peter's April column addressed rumor management, both online and off. He notes that even the most fringe commentary can look reputable and reach a huge audience, which is something we have seen to be often overwhelming and frightening to clients just getting into the web space. An intensive audit of online conversation about your company and regular monitoring can help familiarize yourself with your most frequent critics/advocates and help you determine where the fringe commentary is. Peter also outlines six major components to dealing with rumors, which I've put below. I recommend reading the rest of his article for more great insight.

Peter Sandman's six tips for rumor response:

1. Repeat the rumor you're rebutting.
2. Be empathetic to those who believe the rumor.
3. Demonstrate that you have taken the rumor seriously.
4. Give evidence that the rumor is false.
5. Discuss any and all evidence that the rumor is true.
6. Promise to stay alert.